01-20-2024, 05:31 AM
(01-20-2024, 01:39 AM)PowerSlave Wrote:I understand. Thanks for clarifying.(01-20-2024, 01:10 AM)MasterAsylum13 Wrote:Its just the annoyance, as i said in my post seeing 2 players heads up checking the blinds while all the thousands gathered and millions watching around the world wait for a sniff at getting a seat. If the prize of winning FDP was 25k, i get the need to win, but get to vip and check in for a few days gets you the measly 5k on offer. So i stick by my point, all in stops the check-checking of blinds during heads up FDP(01-20-2024, 12:23 AM)Fredswar1 Wrote:"Slippery slope fallacy"... Ever heard of irony? *facepalm*(01-19-2024, 12:52 PM)MasterAsylum13 Wrote:(01-14-2024, 04:13 PM)Fredswar1 Wrote: I think a queue system for the poker tables would be very nice. I remember just a few days ago how I spent 10mins waiting for a spot at the table just for someone else to take it before I could join.An all-in or max bet rule? LOL
An all in or max bet rule would be interesting. How would it work though?
What next? A quota on the number of hands one can win during a poker game?
As much as I hate bingo poker I try to avoid the donkey players, that's it.
It's called poker...
Life's rough... some really ought to toughen up a bit.
Part of what makes poker great is how intense and high stakes it can be. I can see how implementing an all in or max bet rule could detract from that. That's why I asked OP how they see the rule they suggested playing out.
Try to avoid the slippery slope fallacy if you can help it.
(01-20-2024, 01:10 AM)MasterAsylum13 Wrote:Its just the annoyance, as i said in my post seeing 2 players heads up checking the blinds while all the thousands gathered and millions watching around the world wait for a sniff at getting a seat. If the prize of winning FDP was 25k, i get the need to win, but get to vip and check in for a few days gets you the measly 5k on offer. So i stick by my point, all in stops the check-checking of blinds during heads up FDP(01-20-2024, 12:23 AM)Fredswar1 Wrote:"Slippery slope fallacy"... Ever heard of irony? *facepalm*(01-19-2024, 12:52 PM)MasterAsylum13 Wrote:(01-14-2024, 04:13 PM)Fredswar1 Wrote: I think a queue system for the poker tables would be very nice. I remember just a few days ago how I spent 10mins waiting for a spot at the table just for someone else to take it before I could join.An all-in or max bet rule? LOL
An all in or max bet rule would be interesting. How would it work though?
What next? A quota on the number of hands one can win during a poker game?
As much as I hate bingo poker I try to avoid the donkey players, that's it.
It's called poker...
Life's rough... some really ought to toughen up a bit.
Part of what makes poker great is how intense and high stakes it can be. I can see how implementing an all in or max bet rule could detract from that. That's why I asked OP how they see the rule they suggested playing out.
Try to avoid the slippery slope fallacy if you can help it.